Old way: Everyone follows a strict list of steps (like a recipe), in their own isolated space. If something unexpected happens, the team gets confused and needs help.
New way: The team knows the goal (like winning the game), and each player is smart enough to figure out the best move, even if things change.

How do they get so smart? How do they understand the rules and the bigger picture?

They use something called an “ontology,” which is like a detailed rulebook, a digital twin, that explains what everything means, how things are connected, and what the rules are.
With this rulebook, the team (or synthetic “agents”, and I’ll come on to those later) can understand the game and the rules, make good decisions, and work together—even when things get tricky.

So what?

The team doesn’t just follow orders, or the recipe if you will. They understand the goal and can plan, adapt, and solve problems, just like real informed people.
This makes businesses faster, smarter, and better at reaching their goals, even when things change.

In short: Instead of just following steps, smart computer helpers use a special rulebook (ontology) to understand what’s going on and help the business win the game, no matter what happens!

I’d like to take a step back. There’s always an evolution when it comes to tech. Learn, evolve, enhance. AI is no different. And how it applies to businesses is also no different.

In the rush to roll out AI and autonomous agents into businesses, we’ve often started in either an unstructured way, or a structured way that’s brute force in nature. It’s largely been point solutions, or gimmicky use cases and one foundational layer is often overlooked: structured knowledge. The knowledge that describes the soul of the business.

In complex, domains like insurance, healthcare, and finance, the move from rigid or deterministic workflows to a goal-oriented approach demands more than generative AI, it requires semantic understanding, contextual intelligence, and interoperable data.

Beyond LLMs: Why semantics matter

LLMs are brilliant at generating plausible responses but blind to structure. They lack an understanding of domain logic, relationships, and process nuance. These elements are encoded in ontologies and these ontologies can be specified using languages like OWL (Web Ontology Language). Ontologies offer a semantic layer. This is a a living schema of concepts, roles, and relations, which provides grounding, continuity, and precision. They describe an enterprise in a formal living way that can be understood both by human (granted, an educated human) and computer alike.

This is crucial in domains like insurance, where reasoning about entities such as claimants, policies, damages, liability, and timeframes is non-trivial and context-dependent and something that needs to be consistent across the entire enterprise. Ontologies encode this knowledge explicitly and systematically, making it computable, queryable, and reusable across applications.

Agentic automation: From tool use to intelligence

The current wave of AI agents has been dominated by tool-based orchestration frameworks. In these systems, large language models (LLMs) are tasked with selecting and executing tools, such as APIs, plugins, or scripts, in response to user prompts. Frameworks like LangChain and AutoGen and protocols such as A2A and even to some extent MCP, exemplify this model, where reasoning is approximated by chaining tool calls through templated prompts.

This approach has enabled impressive demos and early use cases. However, beneath the surface, these agents remain fragile and reactive. Their behavior is often governed by narrow rules, implicit assumptions, and prompt-engineered flows. They can sequence tasks, but they cannot truly reason about business context. They lack structured memory, shared understanding, and long-term coherence. In enterprise environments where stakes are high and logic is complex, like insurance claims, regulatory compliance, or supply chain optimization, this fragility becomes a serious limitation.

To build systems that go beyond surface-level automation, we must introduce a semantic foundation, an understanding of the business as a whole. This is where ontologies come in. By embedding a formal, machine-interpretable model of the business domain, agents gain access to structured meaning of the entities and relationships in the business. Instead of guessing what a "claimant," "incident," or "coverage window" might imply based on the stochastic model of the LLM, they can operate on those entities directly, the explicit context fed into the model’s understanding, with awareness of their roles, constraints, and relationships.

This capability transforms what agents can do. With an ontology layer, agents are able to:

Interpret actions in context, not just as isolated tool calls
Collaborate with other agents and services using a shared understanding of business logic
Make decisions based on explicit reasoning, not just precedent or prompt syntax
Interact with humans in the loop using the language common to the enterprise

This shift also redefines how we think about retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and cache-augmented generation (CAG). In current frameworks, RAG and CAG is often used to inject domain knowledge into prompts by searching a document store or vector database. This adds real-time state and context, such as the user’s previous actions, current system conditions, or business metadata, into the agent’s prompt context.

But when a rich ontology is present, many of these augmentation steps become super-powered. Instead of retrieving unstructured context, the agent can query the ontology. Instead of re-grounding itself with every prompt, it operates within a stable semantic environment. This leads to three key shifts:

RAG becomes contextually aware, grounded in the business context and limited by those guardrails
RAG becomes more precise, used selectively for state-aware personalization
The ontology becomes the primary logic and memory engine

In short, we move from agents that call tools to agents that understand, reason, and plan. Ontologies provide the missing layer of intelligence, turning orchestration into cognition, and transforming agents from task-followers into true collaborators.

The goal-driven business: A new operating model

Most enterprises today are built around processes. Business logic is encoded into rigid workflows, checklists, and form-driven interfaces, even in people’s heads. They’re often implemented through ERP systems or industry-specific SaaS products.

These systems are deterministic by design.

They expect the world to conform to a predefined process, and when it doesn't, they break. Exceptions require human escalation, rework, or downstream compensation, they require complex conditional workflows for edge cases and no small amount of operational overheads to maintain.

This model served the early phases of digitization, but it is rapidly approaching its limits.

In contrast, a goal-driven business operates on a different principle. Rather than encoding how every outcome must be achieved, it focuses on what the desired outcome is. It then empowers intelligent agents to figure out the best path dynamically. This model requires systems that can:

Understand the intent behind a goal
Interpret the context in which the goal is being pursued
Navigate constraints, make trade-offs, and adapt plans over time

This approach mirrors how human experts work. An experienced claims adjuster does not follow a fixed script. They assess context, apply knowledge, infer risk, request more information if needed, and reach decisions aligned with business objectives. A goal-driven system aims to replicate this reasoning capability in software, not by writing more rules, but by equipping agents with structured knowledge and semantic context.

A fundamental difference between an agentic approach to goals and an expert leading this drive is scale.

And, the key enabler of this approach that allows the machine to realistically work towards business objectives is the semantic layer. Ontologies give the system an internal model of the business world. As we’ve established, this means defining what entities exist, how they relate, and what rules govern them. This allows goals to be interpreted in context and enables agents to plan actions that respect both local constraints and global objectives.

In this paradigm:

Business logic is emergent, not hardcoded
Execution is adaptive, not linear
Coordination is agentic, not orchestrated through brittle pipelines

With semantic layers, reasoning models, and ontology-native infrastructure we see that goal-driven businesses are not only possible, they are becoming essential as complexity increases in our enterprises.

As markets shift faster and customer expectations rise, companies that can respond flexibly, reason contextually, and automate intelligently will outpace those bound by deterministic legacy systems.

We are at an inflection point where business are moving from Determinism to becoming Goal-driven

Business operating system 1.0 - ERP/SaaS Era: Deterministic workflows and rigid logic

In the early phase of enterprise automation, organizations were largely dependent on deterministic systems, structured around ERP platforms and SaaS workflows, inherently opinionated software built for the lowest common denominator.

These systems enforced business logic through highly opinionated schemas, predefined processes, and strict compliance rules. While effective for standardizing operations, they left little room for adaptability. Every edge case or process variation had to be explicitly engineered, often requiring expensive professional services or brittle workaround layers. Business logic wasn’t emergent, it was hard-coded. As a result, companies became tightly coupled to the limitations of their software stack, operating more like mechanical machines than adaptive systems.

Business operating system 2.0 - LLM + tool use: From static logic to dynamic execution

The introduction of large language models (LLMs), generative AI and tool-augmented agents marked a major leap forward. Suddenly, systems could interpret natural language requests and execute complex tasks by invoking tools, calling APIs, generating code, or synthesizing knowledge from documents.

This dynamic execution layer allowed businesses to experiment with more flexible automation, reduce dependency on form-based interfaces, and expand the scope of AI support. However, these systems still lacked true domain intelligence. They responded to prompts, not intentions. They used tools, but without context. They are orchestrated through a workflow rather than reactive to a non-deterministic, educated plan.

Without access to structured knowledge or business models, their behavior remained shallow, useful for one-off tasks, but limited in their capacity to reason or plan over time.

Business operating system 3.0 - ontology + agentic Layer: Toward goal-driven automation

As the modern enterprise scales and adapts, the business operating system needs to grow as well. The next stage is defined by semantic intelligence and goal-directed agents. This is the era of ontology-powered automation, where agents are grounded in domain-specific knowledge encoded in formal ontologies (e.g., OWL).

These ontologies capture not just data structures, but the meanings, relationships, and rules that govern the business. With this layer in place, agents don’t just react—they understand. They can reason about goals, constraints, and timelines. They can decompose complex tasks into subtasks, coordinate with other agents, and adapt when conditions change.

Instead of following rigid workflows, the system dynamically plans and executes actions aligned with business intent. This is where automation stops being a function and becomes an intelligence layer.

Becoming a goal-driven business: Ontology as the new operating system

The true power of automation does not lie in faster task execution or smarter chat interfaces. It lies in the ability to align machines with goals. That is to create systems that understand what a business is trying to achieve and can act intelligently in pursuit of those outcomes.

This is the promise of becoming a goal-driven business.

In a goal-driven enterprise, automation is not built around predefined process maps or brittle rule chains. Instead, the system is given intent, and it autonomously charts a path to the outcome, making decisions, adapting to context, and coordinating across tools and services. It plans, reasons, and learns, just as a skilled human would.

To achieve this, the system must first understand the business. At a deep level. That means not just its workflows, but its semantics. This is where ontologies come in.

Ontologies are not just metadata schemas or taxonomies. They are rich, structured representations of business knowledge. They encode the meanings of things: what a "claim" is, how it relates to a "policy," what conditions constitute "liability," how timelines, actors, exceptions, and thresholds interact. They define the grammar of the business world. This all coalesces into making it intelligible to machines.

When paired with agentic infrastructure and large reasoning models, ontologies become a control layer for intelligent systems. They provide grounding, explainability, and direction. They allow agents to:

Interpret goals in context
Plan multistep strategies
React to changing conditions
Coordinate with other agents toward shared outcomes

The Business Operating System 3.0 operationalizes business ontologies, embeds them into agentic planning environments, and equips intelligent agents with the capacity to reason about the world they act in. It is not a chatbot layer. It is a semantic substrate for enterprise intelligence.

Business becomes non-deterministic by design, capable of evolving with the market
Logic is expressed through semantics, not hardcoded into software
Automation is goal-aligned and agent-orchestrated, not task-driven and form-bound

This is how the deterministic systems of the ERP era give way to adaptive infrastructures. This is how brittle workflows evolve into intelligent ecosystems. This is how businesses stop automating tasks and start automating outcomes.

And this is how a company become truly goal-driven.

AI Transparency

Valliance News

AI Transparency